CALL 305-379-6000

Hidden Income or Fair Game? Imputing Income in Florida Child Support and Alimony Cases

In Florida family law, income is the foundation upon which child support and alimony determinations are built. But what happens when a parent or spouse claims they earn little to nothing—despite evidence suggesting otherwise? Florida courts are not required to accept income figures at face value. Instead, judges may impute income, a powerful legal tool designed to prevent parties from avoiding their financial responsibilities by remaining unemployed, underemployed, or strategically minimizing earnings.

For parents and spouses navigating divorce, paternity, or modification proceedings, understanding when and how income can be imputed is critical. What one party may characterize as a legitimate career choice, health limitation, or business downturn, the court may view as voluntary and avoidable. The difference can significantly impact child support and alimony outcomes.

What Does “Imputing Income” Mean?

Imputing income occurs when a Florida court assigns an income value to a party that differs from what they claim to earn. Rather than relying solely on reported wages or tax returns, the court determines what a person should be earning based on their ability, qualifications, and opportunities.

Florida law permits imputation when a party is found to be voluntarily unemployed or voluntarily underemployed. This principle applies in both child support and alimony cases and is rooted in the idea that financial obligations to children and former spouses should not be sidestepped through personal choice or manipulation.

The Legal Framework in Florida

Florida Statutes §61.30 governs child support, while §61.08 addresses alimony. Both statutes allow courts to consider earning capacity rather than actual income when appropriate.

Under §61.30(2)(b), if a parent is voluntarily unemployed or underemployed, child support “shall be calculated based on a determination of potential income.” The statute instructs courts to evaluate factors such as:

  • Recent work history

  • Occupational qualifications

  • Educational background

  • Prevailing earnings in the community

For alimony, courts similarly examine earning capacity, especially when determining the ability to pay or a spouse’s need for support.

Voluntary vs. Involuntary Unemployment

A key issue in any imputation case is whether the unemployment or underemployment is voluntary.

Voluntary unemployment or underemployment might include:

  • Quitting a job without a compelling reason

  • Choosing to work fewer hours

  • Accepting a lower-paying position despite higher earning capacity

  • Remaining unemployed while capable of working

Involuntary circumstances, on the other hand, may include:

  • Layoffs or company closures

  • Serious medical conditions

  • Economic downturns affecting an entire industry

  • Caregiving responsibilities that are reasonable and necessary

The burden typically falls on the party seeking imputation to prove that the other party’s reduced income is voluntary and not the result of circumstances beyond their control.

Common Scenarios Where Income Is Imputed

1. Career Changes or “Lifestyle Choices”

A parent who leaves a lucrative career to pursue a passion project or return to school may still have income imputed at their former earning level. Florida courts have repeatedly held that personal fulfillment does not override financial obligations to children or former spouses.

2. Self-Employed Individuals and Business Owners

Business owners present unique challenges. Income may be obscured through retained earnings, excessive business deductions, or reduced distributions. Courts may look beyond tax returns to assess cash flow, perquisites, and overall control over business finances.

If a business owner has discretion over salary or distributions, a court may impute income based on historical earnings or industry standards.

3. Cash-Based or Under-the-Table Work

When evidence suggests a party is earning unreported income—such as cash jobs, tips, or side businesses—the court may impute income based on lifestyle evidence, spending patterns, or testimony from third parties.

4. Intentional Reduction to Avoid Support

Courts take a dim view of attempts to reduce income to avoid paying child support or alimony. If a reduction coincides suspiciously with litigation or enforcement actions, imputation is more likely.

Evidence Courts Consider

Imputation cases are fact-intensive. Judges rely on a wide range of evidence, including:

  • Employment records and resumes

  • Tax returns and financial affidavits

  • Bank statements and credit card records

  • Lifestyle evidence (homes, vehicles, travel, spending habits)

  • Vocational evaluations or expert testimony

  • Job market data and prevailing wage statistics

Vocational experts are frequently used to assess earning capacity, especially when a party claims they cannot find suitable employment.

Imputation in Modification Proceedings

Imputed income is not limited to initial divorce or paternity cases. It often arises in modification actions, where one party seeks to reduce support due to alleged changes in income.

Florida courts closely scrutinize whether a claimed reduction is substantial, material, involuntary, and permanent. A voluntary reduction—even years after the original order—may not justify a decrease in support if the party still has the ability to earn more.

Defending Against Imputation

For individuals facing potential imputation, preparation is key. Successful defenses often involve:

  • Documenting diligent job searches

  • Providing medical records or expert testimony

  • Demonstrating industry-wide downturns

  • Showing reasonable efforts to maximize income

  • Explaining legitimate business or career decisions

Courts are more receptive when a party can show good faith efforts rather than passive unemployment.

Why Imputation Matters

The financial impact of imputed income can be substantial. Child support and alimony awards based on earning capacity rather than actual income may result in obligations that feel disconnected from reality. Conversely, for the receiving party, imputation can be the difference between fair support and financial hardship.

Florida courts strive to balance fairness with accountability. Imputation is not intended to punish, but to ensure that support determinations reflect economic reality—not artificial numbers crafted to gain advantage in litigation.

Final Thoughts

Whether income is “hidden” or simply misunderstood, Florida family courts have broad discretion to look beyond pay stubs and tax returns. For parents and spouses involved in child support or alimony disputes, imputing income is often one of the most contested—and consequential—issues in a case.

At Genova Family Law, we understand the complexity of imputation cases and the high stakes involved. Whether you are seeking to prove hidden income or defending against unfair imputation, experienced legal guidance can make all the difference in presenting a clear, credible, and compelling financial picture to the court.