<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Equal Timesharing Presumption and Mandatory Written Findings in both Original and Supplemental Petitions for Modification: How Fla. Stat. § 61.13 and Lally v. Raber Reshape Florida Parenting Plans	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://genovafamilylaw.com/2026/10/the-equal-timesharing-presumption-and-mandatory-written-findings-in-both-original-and-supplemental-petitions-for-modification-how-fla-stat-%c2%a7-61-13-and-lally-v-raber-reshape-florida-parenting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://genovafamilylaw.com/2026/10/the-equal-timesharing-presumption-and-mandatory-written-findings-in-both-original-and-supplemental-petitions-for-modification-how-fla-stat-%c2%a7-61-13-and-lally-v-raber-reshape-florida-parenting/</link>
	<description>Marital and Family Law Board Certified Attorney</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 10:40:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
</channel>
</rss>
