ALIMONY REFORM – DEMYSTIFIED

The year 2023 marked an extraordinary period for family law in Florida,  primarily due to a landmark overhaul of alimony legislation. These significant  changes, primarily encapsulated in Senate Bill (SB) 1416, took effect on July 1,  2023, and are poised to impact practitioners and clients profoundly. The new  statutory framework, which reflects years of negotiation and input from various  stakeholders, eliminates permanent alimony, introduces new guidelines for  durational alimony, and mandates specific written findings of fact in judicial  determinations. This article will delve into these critical revisions and illustrate  their application through an analysis of the recent Edman v. Edman case. 

Key Changes to Alimony Under SB 1416 

The most significant change brought by SB 1416 is the removal of permanent  alimony as a permissible award. While temporary, bridge-the-gap, and  rehabilitative alimony forms remain, durational alimony has undergone  substantial revisions. The legislation now imposes specific caps on the length  of durational alimony awards, correlating them to the duration of the  marriage. Marriage lengths are redefined as: 

  • Short-term: Less than 10 years (modified from less than 7 years). Moderate-term: Between 10 and 20 years (modified from between 7 and  17 years). 
  • Long-term: 20 years or longer (modified from 17 years or longer). 

Durational alimony may not exceed 50% of the length of a short-term marriage,  60% of a moderate-term marriage, or 75% of a long-term marriage. Courts may  extend these lengths under exceptional circumstances, which require a  showing of clear and convincing evidence. This evidence must consider specific  factors, including the obligee’s age, employability, financial resources, mental or  physical disability, and their role as a caregiver to a mentally or physically  disabled child common to the parties. 

Furthermore, the statute introduces a calculation guideline for the amount of  durational alimony, setting it as the obligee’s reasonable need OR an amount  not exceeding 35% of the difference between the parties’ net incomes, whichever  is less. This guideline, however, does not apply to temporary or other forms of  alimony. The burden of proving the need for support and the other party’s  ability to pay now rests on the party seeking support. While adultery remains  a consideration, its statutory placement has shifted. 

Crucially, the new law mandates specific written findings of fact for all  alimony determinations, including instances where support is denied due to a 

lack of need or ability to pay. Courts must also make specific findings when  requiring an obligor to purchase or maintain a life insurance policy or bond to  secure an alimony award, with the cost apportioned based on the parties’ ability  to pay. 

Supportive Relationships and Retirement 

The legislation also significantly revises provisions concerning supportive  relationships, changing the discretionary “may” to a mandatory “must” when it  comes to reducing or terminating alimony upon such a finding. A supportive  relationship is now broadly defined to include a person “who is not related to the  obligee by consanguinity or affinity”. The obligor must prove, by a preponderance  of the evidence, that a supportive relationship existed within 365 days prior to  the petition’s filing. If proven, the burden shifts to the obligee to demonstrate  why the award should not be reduced or terminated. The court must consider  and make written findings of fact regarding various factors to determine the  nature of the relationship, including financial support, cohabitation, and shared  responsibilities. 

Regarding retirement, SB 1416 codifies Pimm v. Pimm, 601 So.2d 534 (Fla.  1992), by authorizing courts to reduce or terminate alimony upon specific  written findings about the obligor’s retirement. An obligor may file a petition to  modify or terminate support up to six months before retirement in reasonable  anticipation. The court must consider specified factors and make written  findings when deciding on such petitions. 

Application in Edman v. Edman 

The impact of these legislative changes is immediately evident in recent Florida  appellate decisions, such as Edman v. Edman, 407 So.3d 452 (Fla. 4th DCA  2025). In Edman, the husband appealed a dissolution of marriage judgment that  awarded permanent alimony and failed to make the findings required by statute.  The appellate court noted that the new statute, which eliminated permanent  alimony and amended Fla. Stat. § 61.08, applied because the husband’s petition  was pending after July 1, 2023, the effective date of the new law. 

The Edman court found that the trial court erred in awarding permanent  alimony, as this was no longer an authorized remedy under Florida law.  Furthermore, the trial court failed to make the necessary factual findings  required by the amended statute concerning the need and ability to pay alimony  and the division of the husband’s retirement pension. The appellate court  reversed in part and remanded the case with instructions for the trial court to  conduct an evidentiary hearing and make the requisite factual findings regarding  alimony and the husband’s pension, underscoring the necessity of strict  compliance with the newly enacted statutory requirements for specific  written findings. The court in Edman explicitly referenced the elimination of 

permanent alimony and the requirement for explicit findings, directly applying  the principles of the new law. This case serves as a clear example of the  judiciary’s expectation for trial courts to adhere diligently to the updated  framework. 

Conclusion 

The 2023 amendments to Florida’s alimony statute represent a fundamental  shift in how alimony is determined and modified, moving towards a more  structured and transparent approach. The emphasis on precise calculations,  fixed durations, and mandatory written findings of fact reflects a legislative  intent to provide greater clarity and predictability in alimony awards. As  demonstrated by Edman v. Edman, appellate courts will enforce these new  requirements rigorously, compelling practitioners to adapt their strategies to  ensure strict compliance with the updated statutory framework. The changes,  whether viewed as positive or challenging, undeniably require careful study and  application by all involved in Florida family law. 

Biography 

Anthony Meehan Genova is a highly qualified legal professional specializing in  family law, particularly known for his extensive experience in mediation and his  commitment to community service. Mr. Genova is Board Certified in Marital &  Family Law. This certification signifies Florida’s official, independent  determination of a lawyer’s expertise to practice in a specialty field of law, widely  regarded as the “gold standard” for Florida lawyers. The Board Certification  program, officiated by The Florida Supreme Court and administered by The  Florida Bar, began in 1982 to help the public select lawyers who are  distinguished in particular areas of law. The Florida Bar thoroughly evaluates  all board-certified lawyers for credibility and expertise in their specific area, as  well as for professionalism and ethics in the practice of law, encapsulated by the  slogan “Evaluated for Professionalism, Tested for Expertise”. 

To achieve this esteemed certification, Mr. Genova, like all board-certified  lawyers, demonstrated a dedication to achieving a heightened level of excellence  through character, professionalism, ethics, and credibility. The rigorous process  requires lawyers to have practiced law for at least five years before becoming  eligible and to show substantial involvement in their chosen area of law. He  successfully passed a comprehensive examination that evaluates a high level of  knowledge, skills, and expertise in the specialty field, and underwent a rigorous  peer-review process assessing competence, professionalism, and ethics. 

Additionally, board-certified lawyers must satisfy continuing legal education  requirements that are more robust than those for general licensure. This  certification is valid for five years, requiring continued practice and attendance  of Florida Bar-approved continuing legal education courses for recertification. As  of 2023, fewer than 5,000 lawyers in Florida, representing only 5% of eligible  Florida Bar members, have earned board certification. Recent research indicates  that lawyers who list themselves as “board-certified” in a specialized area are  25% to 40% more likely to be hired than non-board-certified counterparts with  similar credentials. When retaining a board-certified lawyer like Mr. Genova,  clients gain access to specialized expertise, professionalism & ethics, credibility,  and a heightened dedication to excellence. His rigorously evaluated experience  and competency offer clients assurance of a heightened level of proficiency in  Marital & Family Law. 

In addition to his board certification, Mr. Genova has been a Supreme Court  Certified Marital & Family Law Mediator since 2019. He has been a dedicated  member of the Executive Council of the Family Law Section of the Florida Bar  since 2016. His significant involvement within this section includes various  leadership and committee roles, demonstrating a deep engagement with the  evolution and practice of family law: Co-chair of the Rules and Forms Committee  (2018-2020), Chair of the Membership Committee (2016-2017), Vice Chair of the  Domestic Violence Committee (2017-2018), Co-Vice Chair for Diversity and  Inclusion (2023-2024), Member of the Equitable Distribution Committee (2017- 2020), Member of the Support Issues Committee (2014-2018).